Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04624
Original file (BC 2013 04624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04624
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His appointment into the Air Force Reserve be changed from 28 Nov 12 to 16 Oct 12 to eliminate his break-in-service. 



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Through no fault of his own, due to a delay in processing the scroll at the Office of the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF), he unjustly incurred a break-in-service between his date of separation (DOS) from the active duty and the date he was gained into the Air Force Reserve.   

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant received an Honorable discharge from active duty on 15 Oct 12. 

Effective 28 Nov 12, under Reserve Order PC-00137, dated 8 Dec 12, the applicant was appointed into the Air Force Reserve.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C.



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his date of appointment into the Air Force Reserve to 16 Oct 12; however, recommends granting an alternate form of relief.  The applicant’s name was scrolled to AF/REP on 20 Aug 12, well in advance of his separation from active duty on 15 Oct 12.  His appointment date in the Reserve was established by SECDEF approval on 28 Nov 12.  Current policy does not allow for backdating commissioning dates as the applicant requests; however, SAF/GCM has determined the AFBCMR has the authority to adjust the DOS for an officer in order to prevent an unwarranted break-in-service.  The applicant’s break-in-service was through no fault of his own and his DOS should therefore be changed to the day prior to his appointment into the Reserve to preclude a break in service.  

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPA evaluation, with attachment is at Exhibit C.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted.  Although we find no evidence of an error on the part of the Air Force, we believe that it is in the interest of justice to provide the relief recommended by ARPC/DPA.  While this is not the relief the applicant seeks, this Board is without authority to adjust appointment dates of commissioned officers.  In this respect, we note that commissioned officers are appointed by virtue of the authority of the Secretary of Defense, which cannot be delegated.  As such, neither the Secretary of the Air Force, nor this Board acting on the Secretary’s behalf, has the authority to adjust the appointment of a commissioned officer.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below.  



THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show the applicant was not released from active duty on 15 October 2012, but on that date, he continued to serve on active duty until 27 November 2012, when he was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve, effective 28 November 2012.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04624 in Executive Session on 2 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 13.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPA, dated 28 Oct 13, w/atch.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 14.














3





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01474

    Original file (BC 2014 01474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01474 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) be changed to 23 Oct 12, rather than 27 Sep 12, to prevent a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, he was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when he transferred from the Regular Air Force to the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03307

    Original file (BC 2014 03307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) be changed to 1 May 14, rather than 28 Feb 14, to prevent a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, he was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when he transferred from the Regular Air Force to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04007

    Original file (BC 2013 04007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service dates be adjusted to remove her break in service. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Officers with a regular commission cannot be gained into the United States Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04426

    Original file (BC-2012-04426.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She separated from the Regular Air Force effective 27 June 2011 and was appointed an officer in the USAFR effective 19 July 2011 (date of SecDef approval). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service record, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04462

    Original file (BC 2013 04462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04462 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) from active duty be adjusted to reflect the day before his Reserve appointment date in order to remove a break-in-service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01741

    Original file (BC 2014 01741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval in regards to adjusting the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03560

    Original file (BC 2013 03560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval of the applicant's request to reflect no break in service. The office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel (OSD/GC) determined the appointment date is the date the SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03138

    Original file (BC 2014 03138.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03138 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of separation (DOS) be changed to 30 Jul 13, rather than 17 Jul 13, to eliminate a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04481

    Original file (BC 2013 04481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04481 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Change the date he was gained into the Air Force Reserve in DEERS to 2 Jul 13 to eliminate his break-in-service. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, due to a delay in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05291

    Original file (BC 2013 05291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ...